Because their formulation is for a uniform channel, bed slope, water surface slope,

the longitudinal force per unit width as a function of the distance from the

upstream edge of the cover, similar to eq 2, i.e.

τη *B*

τη

-2*k*0λ*x*

(τi + *f*3 ) - *k*cλ - 2*k *λ (τi + *f*3 ) - *k*cλ - *f*1 exp * B *

(6)

2*k*0λ

0

0

0

ness" of an ice jam over steady, uniform flow. Pariset et al. also suggest definitions

for narrow and wide jams. When the term within the large brackets of eq 6 (the

multiplier of the exponential term) is negative, the longitudinal force *F *is a maxi-

mum at the upstream edge of the cover (*x *= 0). This is the case for so-called narrow

jams. As the cover progresses upstream, the downstream thrust is resisted by shear

stress at the banks, which grows faster than the additional hydrodynamic forces

exerted on the jam. Conversely, when the term within the brackets is positive, the

longitudinal force *F *grows with distance downstream from the upstream edge of

the jam, asymptotically approaching a maximum as the distance grows very large.

This maximum longitudinal force acting through a wide jam is

τη

(τi + *f*3 ) - *k*cλ .

(7)

2*k*0λ

0

Pariset et al. recognized that this maximum force (or sum of external forces) is

resisted by the strength of the accumulated ice, which is assumed to behave as a

granular material. If *F*max exceeds jam strength, the jam fails and must thicken until

there is a balance between the external forces and jam strength. They likened the

maximum strength of the ice jam to that of a granular material under complete

mobilization of the passive pressure resistance, i.e.

η2

η2

2 π φ

= tan + *s*iρ*g*(1 - *s*i )

(8)

4 2

2

2

the accumulated broken ice, and is commonly taken as the angle of repose for granu-

lar materials. Pariset et al. then equated jam internal stress to the sum of the stresses

exerted by the external forces. In doing so, they introduced the coefficient , where

= *k*0Kpλ

(9)

which combines the ice properties into one coefficient. The stress balance results in

an equation relating jam thickness and stresses exerted against the jam:

η2

τc η

(τi + *f*3 ) - .

=

(10)

2

2

The shear stress τi in eq 10 is expressible as

τi = ρ*g * 2

(11)

where *u *is water velocity beneath the cover and *C *is the Chezy coefficient. Pariset

et al. assumed that values of *C *are essentially equivalent for the ice surface and the

bed.

14